Blog›Legal & Compliance
Legal & Compliance

Confession of Judgment in MCA: Status After New York's 2019 Ban

How COJs worked in MCA, why New York banned them in 2019, and what funders use to enforce defaults today.

Owner Leads Direct Editorial•February 20, 2026•8 min

Confession of Judgment was for years the MCA industry's most powerful enforcement tool — and ultimately its biggest reputational liability. Understanding what changed in 2019 and what's used now matters for any broker explaining contract terms to a merchant.

What a COJ is

A Confession of Judgment is a document signed by a debtor at the time of borrowing, in which the debtor consents to entry of judgment against them in the event of default — without notice, without a hearing, without an opportunity to defend.

Pre-2019, MCA contracts routinely included COJs. When a merchant defaulted, the funder filed the pre-signed COJ in a New York court, obtained a judgment within days, and could begin asset seizure across all 50 states using full faith and credit enforcement.

Why New York banned them

A series of investigative reports in 2018 documented widespread abuse — funders filing COJs against out-of-state merchants who had no connection to New York, judgments obtained in cases of disputed default, and merchants ruined before they could mount a defense.

In 2019, New York amended its COJ statute to prohibit entry of judgment based on a confession unless the debtor was a New York resident or the contract had a substantial New York nexus. The change effectively killed the COJ as a national enforcement tool.

What replaced it

  • ▸Aggressive UCC enforcement (lockbox arrangements, bank account freezes via writs)
  • ▸Personal guarantee enforcement against the owner individually
  • ▸Collection litigation in the merchant's home state — slower, more expensive, but legitimate
  • ▸Forbearance and restructuring offers as the first response to default

Operational impact

Default recoveries are slower and more expensive in 2026 than they were pre-2019. Underwriting tightened in response — lower max deal sizes, stronger personal guarantees, more conservative factor rates on weaker paper. The industry is healthier and less litigious than it was, even if the unit economics are tighter.

// About this article
OLD
Owner Leads Direct Editorial Team
Editorial & Research
Published February 20, 2026

The Owner Leads Direct Editorial & Research team writes, reviews and maintains every public page on this site. Drafts are produced collaboratively (including AI-assisted drafting) and reviewed by a human editor with relevant subject-matter experience in MCA, commercial lending, B2B data or compliance before publication. Every quantitative claim is cited to a primary source or labeled as internal Owner Leads Direct data. We publish corrections within 72 hours of a verified report.

Merchant cash advance underwriting and pricingB2B owner contact data sourcing and verificationTCPA, CCPA/CPRA and AI-agent disclosure rulesLead-buyer economics (CPL, CAC, LTV, factor rates, ACH holdback)
Reviewed byOwner Leads Direct Compliance Team — Compliance & Legal
// Take the next step

Need direct owner contact data?

Owner Leads Direct provides pre-researched US business owner contact records — names, direct mobile numbers, emails, and funding signals where available — sourced through our partner MCA and lending network.

Looking to buy MCA data rather than just research it?

Keep this guide for the explanation. Use the relevant buying page to compare record types, included fields, published pack prices and what requires a written availability check.

No record purchase guarantees contact permission, approval or funding. Geographic quantities are confirmed by email.

// Pricing

Done reading? Move from research to inventory.

Compare current recurring plans, one-time lead packs, and quote-only custom orders from one pricing catalog.